I think I messed up all the files, so this is the correct set of data: ti1, ti2 and the ti3 that is scanned with a known spectro: i1Pro1 (to be used as a reference file to build a new ti3 using the date from the CR30 obtained scandata in csv-format) + the csv-file based on the LAB + spectral data from 400-700 nm obtained by scanning with the Aliexpress CR30 colorimeter.
Yep that works now, before you rescan, the last remaining step is that the csv needs unique per-patch names that we can match to SAMPLE_LOC of the .ti2 (e.g. A1, B2 etc.). Right now I'm just matching the closest values but that is not accurate or reliable. I noticed from the screenshots that there are quite some measurement parameters available, see if you can include a reproduceable index to the csv, so we can match the measurement to the correct SAMPLE_LOC
Unfortunately it is not possible but what I can do is make a new target and choose not to randomize the patch layout (standard setting in printtarg command) so the data layout in ti1 and ti2 are in line with another making comparison easier. I keep your informed many thanks for all your work and help already Thanks
So here you are, it took me more than an hour to produce the set:
the patches in the ti2 are no longer scrambled but are aligned with the ti1 color patch sequence and there is a ti3 file generated from scanning with the i1Pro1 to be used as a dummy ti3 for the data from the csv file to be converted and to be pasted into it.
Warning for those who already downloaded the previous zip file in previous post: PLEASE download it again, because the ti3 file was corrupted. I had to rescan it again to regenerate a functional ti3 file again.
This is the profile 3D model when using the right ti3 file: