Pharmacist,
Some of these 'Happy Users' are not user at all but are company insiders trying to promote their product and put down their competitors at the same time.
Case in point comments posted by Don Yong (
http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00JRDw)
I will copy them here for you to see (below)
http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00EPs6
Answers
Don Yong , Jul 20, 2006; 08:33 a.m.
You may want to try
http://www.kyson.yangportal.com.
They offer a 30 day free trial and their ink is made in the USA. Not imported.
They also provide a printer protection program where if their product damages
your printer in any way, they will pay for the cost of replacing the printer.
Otherwise, check auctions on eBay and read the seller's feedback concerning
the systems he/she sold. Usually eBay buyers are fairly honest.
They key is buy only from USA, not imported. Even Lyson is fishy.
I heard rumors they are actually just Chinese products relabelled into the Lyson name.
http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00JRDw
Don Yong , Aug 16, 2008; 11:06 a.m.
I think the bottom line is whether or not these Kyson inks produce the same or better quality
than the original Canon inks. From my experience with the Kyson System for the Pro 9000,
the color output has been impressive and projects have been fade resistant thus far for
about 2 years now. Having a chemistry background, I know that pigments can be dissolved
in solution and precipitate backout once it reacts with another media such as paper.
This is the only explanation for how a pigment based ink can be used in a Canon printer
without clogging issues. I'm not sure if this is how Kyson is formulating their pigment
inks but it would be the explanation for why the ink stays translucent and not thick like
other traditional pigment inks that can only be used in Epson printers.
It's odd why Bill Wong has included a link in this thread directly to an article from
the Lyson company advertising their inks. My understanding is Kyson and Lyson, though
they sound the same, are two of the largest manufacturers of ink systems and fierce competitors.
If Billy Wong has any affiliation with the Lyson company, he should not add any more input into this thread.
If you go the link (
http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00JRDw)
and click on Don Yong You will see the following,
Don Yong
A member of the photo.net community since July 20, 2006. (Give this person a gift subscription)
Personal home page:
http://mitsu.yangportal.com
This page has been visited 152 times since August 31, 2006
Forum Postings
August 16, 2008: Response to Kyson Vista CIS & Canon i9900 - pigmented inks??
August 31, 2006: Response to Recommendation for LCD Video Projector for PC Photo Presentations
August 31, 2006: Recommendation for LCD Video Projector for PC Photo Presentations
July 20, 2006: Response to Canon i950 continuous ink system
Current as of: Tue Aug 26 11:54
Is it a coincidence that Don Yong is on the '
http://mitsu.yangportal.com ' and
Kyson is on '
http://www.kyson.yangportal.com ' ? I don't think so.
Also the name Don Yong is very similiar to DAN YOUNG , top guy at Kyson.
These self-promoters have a few things in common (their MO).
1- Claim to have a chemistry background (to give their opion more credibility)
2- Come up with wild explainations of how pigments can be dissolved and magically
reappear once it touches paper ( much like putting your tooth under a pillow and
expect it to turn to cash), would be laughtible if Kyson actually printed that.
3- Make up ugly rummers about their competitors (usually about Lyson).
4- Buy Kyson products, you have nothing to loose ( yah right, see what Bill Wong has lossed)
Suspiciously , LOCKMAN's posting fits this MO.