Profile Assessment

pharmacist

Printer Master
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
May 29, 2007
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
841
Points
293
Location
Ghent, Belgium
Printer Model
Epson Pro 3880, P800, WF-7525
Hi Emulator,

I just discovered that ArgyllCMS version 1.6.1 seems to push up magenta/reds too much. I did some tests with version 1.6.2 and the profiles are now identical too the ones created with the Colormunki for the reds/magenta. So please upgrade to version 1.6.2 to correct for this strange behaviour.
 

Emulator

Printer Master
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
1,303
Points
267
Location
UK
Printer Model
Canon Pro9000 II
Hi Emulator,

I just discovered that ArgyllCMS version 1.6.1 seems to push up magenta/reds too much. I did some tests with version 1.6.2 and the profiles are now identical too the ones created with the Colormunki for the reds/magenta. So please upgrade to version 1.6.2 to correct for this strange behaviour.
Hi pharmacist,

The Argyll CMS Sihl profile I am using is the one you generated some time ago, which I believe is 1.6.1. It does appear a bit strong on the reds, but not as unpredictable as the CM profiles taken as a whole and the Canon profiles which seem very low on saturation.

Like Rodbam and Roy, I have not setup Argyll CMS, we are a timid lot, and as "retirees" we have all the time to do it.

Trying to make judgements on profile quality is not easy and as many have said the final proof is the visual image.
 
Last edited:

Emulator

Printer Master
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
1,303
Points
267
Location
UK
Printer Model
Canon Pro9000 II
Incidentally, I see the latest version of Argyll is now 1.6.3
 

Emulator

Printer Master
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
1,303
Points
267
Location
UK
Printer Model
Canon Pro9000 II
@RogerB, I had forgotten how interesting your guidance on profiles and Gamutvision was. I noticed some headline images that Nifty's system put up and found this thread again.

We weren't all using Argyll then, so things have moved on a bit, but well worth reading through again for those interested.
 

Smile

Printer Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
1,738
Reaction score
375
Points
253
Location
Europe EU
Printer Model
Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
The Gamutvision BW density assessment screen is very hard to read, I mean there is no usable zoom? And the scale is +20 -20?

The scale is should be like +5 -5 or at least +10 -10, yes you can zoom it in, but then whole length of scale is not viewable.

Yes the log scale is nice but I had viewed one profile shown as very good grayscale then when checked in colorthink pro the opposite is shown.
 

Ink stained Fingers

Printer Master
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
3,390
Reaction score
3,658
Points
283
Location
Germany
Printer Model
L310/805/1800, P400, Pro7600
o.k., I'm not really sure, what the last test/picture is supposed to tell me, I guess most of the
colors of the color band are saturated and a major part of it outside the printer gamut.
This becomes visible with the rel. col, setting, the color saturation of the colors had to be
reduced visibly to squeeze them into the gamut of the selected paper. 'There is one effect which should not become visible - banding is an indication of some local weakness of the profile at the affected color/saturation range. An evaluation with Gamutvision may show that more clearly
 

Roy Sletcher

Indolent contrarian
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
978
Reaction score
1,007
Points
233
Location
Ottawa, CANADA
Printer Model
Canon Pro-100, and Epson 3880
The Gamutvision BW density assessment screen is very hard to read, I mean there is no usable zoom? And the scale is +20 -20?

The scale is should be like +5 -5 or at least +10 -10, yes you can zoom it in, but then whole length of scale is not viewable.

Yes the log scale is nice but I had viewed one profile shown as very good grayscale then when checked in colorthink pro the opposite is shown.
Glad to find I am not the only one to find Gamutvision unreliable and hard to view.

I just can't bring myself to send them US$100 for a product that to me seems to be in serious need of fine tuning and a tech support option.

(or maybe they have - been a couple of years since I visited their site)

RS
 

Smile

Printer Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
1,738
Reaction score
375
Points
253
Location
Europe EU
Printer Model
Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
Gamutvision is more like scientific tool, for certain areas that colorthink pro does not show.

To judge the printer profile accuracy a proper RGB certification patch sheet needs to be printed, measured, evaluated by measuring it. There are no software substitutes that can do this reliably imho.
 

RogerB

Print Addict
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
293
Reaction score
313
Points
183
Location
S.E. England
Printer Model
Epson Pro3880
Gamutvision is more like scientific tool, for certain areas that colorthink pro does not show.

To judge the printer profile accuracy a proper RGB certification patch sheet needs to be printed, measured, evaluated by measuring it. There are no software substitutes that can do this reliably imho.
Yes, I agree. The ultimate test of accuracy involves the measurement of a printed target, but that takes quite a long time. A tool like Gamutvision (or Colorthink?) can check the internal consistency of a profile very quickly. It usses the profile to predict the printed colours and calculates the deviation from the actual image colour. If the initial measurements are accurate then the process quite reliable. I often use a 288-patch target for this, and Gamutvision gives a result like the one below.
Ashampoo_Snap_2015.03.09_13h52m14s_002_Gamutvision 1-3-7  .png
For this particular profile I have printed and measured the same target - the method that you advocate. The measured results are not quite as good as the Gamutvision prediction, with a mean deltaE of 1.23 but I take that as a good result. (I already posted this information http://www.printerknowledge.com/threads/a-basic-guide-see-post-1-to-setting-up-argyll-cms-profiling-on-your-computer.8570/page-13#post-69573)

The Gamutvision BW density assessment screen is very hard to read, I mean there is no usable zoom? And the scale is +20 -20?

The scale is should be like +5 -5 or at least +10 -10, yes you can zoom it in, but then whole length of scale is not viewable.

Yes the log scale is nice but I had viewed one profile shown as very good grayscale then when checked in colorthink pro the opposite is shown.
I'm not really sure what your problem is with the B&W density display. Gamutvision displays L* from 0-100 and automatically scales the axis for a* and b* to suit. In the best case the scale for a* and b* is -2 to +10, like the one below. (The parameters plotted are 10x a* and b*)
Ashampoo_Snap_2015.03.09_13h42m11s_001_Gamutvision 1-3-7  .png
I should say I don't get commission from Imatest for Gamutvision sales. I use it because I find it's quick, easy and reliable and it displays the information in a way that I can easily understand. (and I can't justify paying $300 more for Colorthink Pro).
 

Smile

Printer Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
1,738
Reaction score
375
Points
253
Location
Europe EU
Printer Model
Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
Gamutvision is free now, GPL license.

But you do need to install the v1.3.7 then on top of that v1.4 otherwise installer of version 1.4 throws me errors.
 
Top