Printer Profile Validation: M1 vs. M2 and ΔE2000 Evaluation

Just an update with the latest version of ChromIQ with the bug fix for the truncated values of i1Profiler.

I have scanned the same target again twice: the first with i1Profiler and the target generated with the i1Profiler engine (neutralize greys at 50 procent) and again with ChromIQ (with the ArgyllCMS i1Pro driver loaded) and the target generated by ChromIQ with standard settings:

View attachment 19718

This time the white point of both profiles are exactly the same. A slight difference in gamut volume (most probably by slight scanning deviations within the margin of error)

Softproof with the ChromIQ version 4.3.20 scanned and ChromIQ generated target:

View attachment 19721

Target with the new exported txf file from ChromIQ 4.2.20 for i1Profiler scanning and profile generating by i1Profiler:

View attachment 19722

The difference is now negligible and no slight yellowish hue in the ChromIQ profile softproofing like previously.

Digitization Resolution 100x100 and with wider pixel sampling

i1P1vsChromiq1.png


i1P1vsChromiq1-1.png
 
Back
Top