ohtoulouz
Printing Apprentice
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2026
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 15
- Printer Model
- Canon Pro-300
Well,
I think I have another question. I have two printers: an Epson XP-970 and a Canon pro-300. I tested paper profiling on the XP-970 and was very happy with the result on a low cost mat paper (compared to a generic mat paper profile). On the Canon-pro-300, the same profiling procedure (and the same paper, of course) leads to different results: colors are a bit light and, the most important to me, there is a slight red cast in the deep shadows that is not present on the XP-970 prints. I have no to little knowledge about icc profiles and I do not understand the difference: I thought that printer profiling should have taken care of potential color cast. Is it because there are not enough gray/or black patches (my 204 patches target is generated with -d2 and -g16)? XP-970 uses die ink whereas Pro-300 uses pigment ink, but that should not be the reason. If you have ideas to improve the results, do not hesitate to post them!
Thanks,
Pierre
I think I have another question. I have two printers: an Epson XP-970 and a Canon pro-300. I tested paper profiling on the XP-970 and was very happy with the result on a low cost mat paper (compared to a generic mat paper profile). On the Canon-pro-300, the same profiling procedure (and the same paper, of course) leads to different results: colors are a bit light and, the most important to me, there is a slight red cast in the deep shadows that is not present on the XP-970 prints. I have no to little knowledge about icc profiles and I do not understand the difference: I thought that printer profiling should have taken care of potential color cast. Is it because there are not enough gray/or black patches (my 204 patches target is generated with -d2 and -g16)? XP-970 uses die ink whereas Pro-300 uses pigment ink, but that should not be the reason. If you have ideas to improve the results, do not hesitate to post them!
Thanks,
Pierre