Search results

Yes, but only for the profile generating process, not for scanning. That is done with it's own proprietary program and only patch by patch.

Did you try on a Windows machine: maybe it is just a MacOS problem ?

@mavtop : Did you use something like this for your i1Pro1: A direct usb-c to printer cable, or do you use a converter from usb-c to usb 3.0 ?

With the latest version beta 21 I can set the Delta-E to 50: The amount of false positives is now much more acceptable to have visual check very quickly whether or not you have to reread a row.

ok, I tried increasing the Delta-E from 20 to 70 now every few patches to see how the amount of highlighted patches are decreasing: From my experience with the i1Studio (Colormunki) and the i1Profiler those highly visible offset difference between expected/measured values are totally normal...

Hi @itsab1989 , not sure what I am doing wrong, but it seems to be restored now: OK, I am retesting the scanning now and increasing the Delta-E to about 40 so see if I still see those unncessary highlights.

I am afraid beta 20 is eine Verschlimmbesserung .......This was available in the beta 19: This is gone in the beta 20.

very strange, this should be visible in the softproofing by strange colour pike in the colour gradients. I don't see anything strange and the softproofing is very smooth and no strange colour spikes. I also see the strange expected/measured values in row D: But it doesn't translate at all...

I suggest to start with the 3 sheets target: Either the A4/Letter 1944 patch target (both 3 sheets). Alan G has very good results with this target (He has compared to his previous 2 step workflow with a preconditioning profile followed with a secondary final target and both are very similar...

@itsab1989 : with the new option enabled the scan seems to succeed succesfully: However there are a lot of pathches highlighted (standard setting: Delta-E: 20), maybe I should increase it a bit: not sure how the engine decides whether or not a patch is highlighted or not, but the...

Hi @itsab1989, Still not seeing beta 16. I presume Claude is still working on it ?

@itsab1989 : I am not sure but I cannot find the button in the generate patches to shuffle/randomize the patch layout before exporting to pxf-file. For the ti1 this is no problem as ChromIQ can do it for you in the patch layout interface. The reason is that the pxf-file is fixed (in order to...

Whow finally something similar to the X-Rite method: expected vs measured value.

Is the converter USB 2.0 to USB-C converter of good quality ?

Hi Veronika, welcome: I suggest not to print borderless unless really necessary. The overspray sponge cannot be replaced unless serviced by Epson, unlike the older P800 where the overspray sponge works with a slight slope so overspray ink drips through the sponge material in the cavity beneath...

Actually I don't have this problem: I have tested with different fixed seed this is with seed value: 25 Now changing to seed: 625: changing back to fixed seed 25: exactly the same patch layout as previous.

It should be fine to scan then.

@mavtop : smaller chart is no problem, too long is a problem as the spectro cannot start/land on white paper. If the patch height is slightly lower than about 8 mm it is still ok, provided you center the gap in between (so the scanning eye will emcompass the whole colour width, even you see...

I believe you need to this first: Installation: Open the DMG, drag ChromIQ to Applications, eject, then launch. ChromIQ is ad-hoc signed (not notarized). On macOS Sonoma+ the right-click → Open trick often fails with "Apple cannot check it for malicious software." If that happens, remove the...

I have done the preprofiling, but I am not so impressed. I have better results with a large target with about 3 sheets (2160 patches) of A4 and easier: otherwise you have to print the first target wait 24 hours scan, generate the secondary target, print again, wait 24 hours again and scan and be...