Search results

I tried to find the "testprofile v2.csv" in the profile_config.ini but could not find it to remove the wrong file name. I will give it a try tomorrow. Meanwhile you might want to have a look at my files above and see if you can generate the profile and compare it to the one generated with the...

So here is the new data set: including a profile made with the i1pro1 for the Action Glossy paper (Epson ET-8550) and the csv file containing the data scanned with the CR30 with the same paper/printer combination: Maybe @x64 you can have a look at and see what the problem exactly is.

OK found how to type in with python, but unfortunately the computer says NOOOO:

Hi @x64 : I am a noob using python because for me it is a bit cryptic how to type in the commands to start the py file. I tried this, but it does not seem to work: Enlightment much appreciated..... Meanwhile I will print the target (both the CR30 and the i1Pro version) again on a totally...

Using 8 years old Inktec HP compatible pigment ink for my Epson WF-7840W printer, still going strong. I use refillable cartridges with auto reset chips that I reset at will my a dedicated resetter after refilling.

The i1Pro3 and the SpyderPrint4 use LED illuminant AFAIK.

many thanks for all the work @x64 : I wil give it a try with another type of paper of which I already have profile made for a side by side comparison to see if the CR30 colorimeter is a feasible alternative for a poor man's printer profiling solution costing only about € 70.-. For this I have do...

Hi @x64 : that is some fantastic job you did. I think the difference is totally explainable. The i1Pro1 ref ti3 is reprinted with a smaller patch size and scanned (but with the same patch layout) and scanned on a yellow table and the CR30 target was printed on a table with a mousepad with...

Warning for those who already downloaded the previous zip file in previous post: PLEASE download it again, because the ti3 file was corrupted. I had to rescan it again to regenerate a functional ti3 file again. This is the profile 3D model when using the right ti3 file:

So here you are, it took me more than an hour to produce the set: the patches in the ti2 are no longer scrambled but are aligned with the ti1 color patch sequence and there is a ti3 file generated from scanning with the i1Pro1 to be used as a dummy ti3 for the data from the csv file to be...

Unfortunately it is not possible but what I can do is make a new target and choose not to randomize the patch layout (standard setting in printtarg command) so the data layout in ti1 and ti2 are in line with another making comparison easier. I keep your informed many thanks for all your work and...

I think I messed up all the files, so this is the correct set of data: ti1, ti2 and the ti3 that is scanned with a known spectro: i1Pro1 (to be used as a reference file to build a new ti3 using the date from the CR30 obtained scandata in csv-format) + the csv-file based on the LAB + spectral...

This is how the profile should look like:

Here it is:

I see the reference 228-target.ti3 (with my i1pro1) is not ok. I will upload it again. Please use this new ti3 als a reference to create the new ti3 using the scan data with the CR30.

I use this setting: colprof -v -qh -i D50 -o 1931_2 -S AdobeRGB1998.icc -cmt -dpp -D%par1% -C%par2% %par3%

actually not, that should not be the case. It should like a inflated pear.

Not sure this will work, because I think the sample_LOC is defined in the ti2 file, where you might extract from there. Sorry I am a noob in Excel. I exported the whole thing again in csv-format. This zip-file has a sample ti3 file include that I scanned using my vintage i1Pro1 spectro in the...

Ohhh, I see an error: the LAB values is BLA instead of LAB...here is the new file: PLEASE use this file (400-700 nm spectral range).

So I managed to include the spectra data: LAB + spectral data from 360-780 nm and a version with LAB + spectral data from 400-700 mm, as there is no value from 360-400 nm and from 700-780 nm (all 0).