Im-back-Arno
Getting Fingers Dirty
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2026
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 20
- Printer Model
- Epson R1900
Hi Knut,Thanks for your thoughts @Im-back-Arno
I think it is always a matter of making the best without going to the most extremes. Generally, the more patches the better, but what you get in improvement is less and less the higher it goes. Some swear to closer to 3000 patches, maybe because they can and have an i1iSis for A3 pages. We were contacted by a lady from Red River, where we added their patch set into the presets in ChromIQ. Their standard patch set to profile all their papers is 2052 patches, so that might be an indicator in the industry.
Take also a look at this post, where I compare @pharmacist's 1944 patch preset with my own that is in the list of presets: post-149535
To your comment on a one-pager for control: We have designed a workflow in ChromIQ that allows regular control measurements of a profile (we call it a verification run), which then outputs a report, from the tool "Measurement Report" in the tools menu.
Attached is an example report made on demo data, as I do not currently have any real data measured over time to get all the trend-graphs.
And here is a screenshot of the Measurement Report window for the attached report:
View attachment 19312
Sebastian and I hope the community can test this feature and report back the results... There are many options to customise limits for each metric checked, and there are 20 different metrics to choose from. Here is a view of the setup window that defines all the metrics and thresholds (all 20 does not fit into one screenshot, as the window scrolls):
View attachment 19313
The Help Card "Getting Started" in the Welcome to ChromIQ window (question mark icon on top-right corner of the app) gives an overview of the workflow in a diagram. I recommend having a look at that. Here is a snapshot of that diagram:
View attachment 19314
Cheers,
Knut
Thanks for the additional info. Around 2,000 patches it is!
Indeed, I did read about the options to do control runs versus time and will try to include that in my workflow once I get the hang of it all and settle on a standard calibration. Will report back on progress and findings on the control workflow when it’s running.
Thanks!
Arno