That’s a bold statement if I ever heard one, if PC inks are that good, how come you still have to substitute some OEM in the inkset… ?
Where’s the evidence, because you can't judge PC inks solely on the basis of hearsay, that is a dis-service to the other ink suppliers in the EU not to mention Korea..
Amazing indeed how everyone judges only on hearsay.
We must also not forget that - by absence of other fora on this matter - sadly enough we are the only voice (in the desert ?) and that we should try to stay objective and speak from experience.
IMO the most important criteria for (3th party) ink are: no clogs or feed problems, adherence, gloss and good gamut.
As far as I can judge after one month and 200 prints, 6 of 10 Octoinkjet inks pass all criteria.
Magenta and particularly red have a good gamut, but some issues to solve on the first criterium (magenta in the first place).
PBK has also a deep black (much better than in my first measures), but is not scratch resistent on glossy papers (as warned), and should be replaced by OEM for best results. No problems on semi-gloss or luster.
CO is much less (gloss enhancing) than OEM.
Actually I use the original Precision Colors CO and rate it 85-90% of OEM.
Since I pay this from my own pocket I have to limit my research to inks I expect to do better.
Because Precision Colors indicates the red is not up to OEM, I see no reason to buy this one.
Based on the published profiles, the gamut to the green and blue side is promised to be better.
I might hope a better adherence of the PBK (together with a deep black).
Other users reported PC magenta has no issues.
According to
@jtoolman José Rodriguez the resin level of the SE CO should be enhanced too.
The Signature Edition Magenta, Yellow, Cyan, PBK and CO will be tested soon.
I still have enough OEM (and bought extra magenta and red) to include in the comparision.