qwertydude
Printing Ninja
- Joined
- May 7, 2009
- Messages
- 522
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 89

Both pictures were printed on kirkland glossy photo paper. The top is the glossy photo paper setting the bottom is the matte photo paper setting other than a difference in color it seems the same at first glance but something caught my eye and ear little bit later. I reprinted them and noticed the matte photo paper took longer, significantly longer. I then noticed that the matte had a much finer grain to it. So here's are extreme blow ups of the flesh tone 1200 dpi scans.

This is the glossy setting.

This is the matte photo paper.
Suffice to say I'm going to run a profile to correct the color output and this will be my defacto print setting since I value print quality over speed. Also if your wondering photo paper plus glossy, glossy II, and semi gloss produce pretty much the same grainier picture as plain glossy. Matte is still the champ.
As a side note I did a quick test profile on profile prism, dynamic range improved 3.5 points and Lab Space coverage improved .7% This is definitely the setting I'm using from now on.