jonalava
Getting Fingers Dirty
I recently bought a refill kit from ebay seller named Inkjetcarts including 6 spongeless refillable carts for my Epson R220 and 4x 6 oz. bottles of dye ink. Seller certified his inks were made by Image Specialists specifically for this printer. First set of carts was DOA (bad chips) so I send them back and got a new set. Second set worked great, but here is the problem with the ink. When printing on Kirkland paper, dark areas that use shades of dark blue showed a lot of bronzing. I tried many ink brands before with this printer (G&G, MMC, Colorful, Printrite and Skyhorse) and none showed this problem on Kirkland paper. I agree that color balance of these other brands was way off (except MMC and Skyhorse) but at least, there was no bronzing. I wonder if this ink is really made by Image Specialists. Back when I was using a Canon IP3000, my main ink was Image Specialists (bought from MIS) and I never had this problem, always with the same "made in Switzerland" Kirkland paper.
I contacted the seller about this and at first, he was defensive and told me I accusing him of selling inks as Image Specialists when it was not. He reassured me that it was. I am willing to believe it, but is it possible? Also, he asked for pictures of my test prints. He then replied with pictures of HIS tests using Epson and Staples paper, without any signs of bronzing. On both my tests and his, it was clearly visible that Image Specialists ink didn't match (in terms of colors) the OEM one. With my Canon, I was used to great color accuracy using Image Specialists inks. The seller concluded that my paper was incompatible with his inks and that I should get some other paper made to work well with OEM inks, then it should work well with his inks.
But isn't Kirkland paper widely compatible (in terms of not showing signs of bronzing)? And why are the colors not as good as say MMC or Skyhorse compatible carts?
Anyway, after loosing too much time with this, I threw everything away and went back to Skyhorse cheap carts.
Any opinions or observations of Image Specialists inks on Kirkland?
Thanks!
I contacted the seller about this and at first, he was defensive and told me I accusing him of selling inks as Image Specialists when it was not. He reassured me that it was. I am willing to believe it, but is it possible? Also, he asked for pictures of my test prints. He then replied with pictures of HIS tests using Epson and Staples paper, without any signs of bronzing. On both my tests and his, it was clearly visible that Image Specialists ink didn't match (in terms of colors) the OEM one. With my Canon, I was used to great color accuracy using Image Specialists inks. The seller concluded that my paper was incompatible with his inks and that I should get some other paper made to work well with OEM inks, then it should work well with his inks.
But isn't Kirkland paper widely compatible (in terms of not showing signs of bronzing)? And why are the colors not as good as say MMC or Skyhorse compatible carts?
Anyway, after loosing too much time with this, I threw everything away and went back to Skyhorse cheap carts.
Any opinions or observations of Image Specialists inks on Kirkland?
Thanks!