I couldn't resist to test the Fujifilm DL dye inks in the R800 to compare the gamut against the L800 prints. (blue and red mixed from the CMY inks)
This plot shows the gamuts at L=50 for both printers with the same ink:
Their color coverage varies slightly - red-L800 green-R800 , this at the L=50 lightness, the overall gamut volume is about the same.
This is the color coverage at a lower lightness of L=20:
The gamut is wider here at darker colors, this continues down to the blackpoint.
And I couldn't resist to overprint the dye patches with GO, available in the R800 to see its impact:
the light blue line is the gamut of the print with GO, green the gamut w/o GO, both with the DL inks in the R800, the gamut with GO is wider, the overall gamut volume is about 6% bigger than w/o GO, this diagram at L=50.
The improvement is more pronounced again at darker colors - L=20 shown here
And there is an additional effect - the black level of the regular print - w/o GO is at L=7, the black level with the GO overprint is at L=4, this is almost 1 f/stop difference in photographic terms and the darker blacks are visible in direct comparison of B/W prints in their darker areas.
Little corners and dents relate to patch reading variations, XRite Profile maker does not smooth the data, but I could read the patches one than 1 time and average the data which I do for profiles I'm actually using.
(L = luminance in the range from 0 - 100, paper white is at about L=94)
So this answers a question I did not consider before - whether a GO overprint of dye ink prints does make a difference - yes - it increases the gamut in this case. This is just a test with one type of glossy paper - the Netbit/Aldi type in this case, I don't know whether the effects would be similar with other papers. This test does not cover the assumed UV shielding effect of a GO overprint - I need more sun for that.