3dogs
Printer Master
- Joined
- May 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,013
- Reaction score
- 996
- Points
- 263
- Location
- Fern Hill, Australia
- Printer Model
- Epson 3880. Canon Pro 9000,
Some months ago I "fluked" an exhibition quality print with this combination. The image was posted here briefly. For reasons of security of the image I withdrew it, no disrespect intended to any of the members.
Yesterday I started the process of framing the image myself. The task was completed, checked and finished
or so I thought
upon turning it over there was a 5mm gap between the matt board and and the print..... so 5mm of the print paper was showing at the bottom of the matt board cut out, the image had been incorrectly positioned on the wrong markers on the Matt board. Nothing for it I attempted to unstick the print from the double sided tape..........

it tore the print. and the matt
I have had to start over, reprint, and cut another matt board.
this thread is about that "new" print:
In the last month or more I have printed just two test prints, nothing else.
An external storage device and Lightroom had a tiff
resulting in severe damage to my inventory. Despite being assured by Lighroom Gurus that the product is bug free, it REALLY scrambled my archive and wiped, and replaced around 1500 images.......AMONGST which was.........YES! it was......GONE from Lightroom, impossible as it is KAPISH!
Located a backup .tiff image and sent it to LR guessed that I had used Canson BFK, guesstimated the processing settings, winged the Printer settings and hit PRINT.
I also made a second print slightly more saturated just in case AND a third print on my XeroxiGen3 plain paper. I used Canson ICC profile for the Serious prints and a home grown profile made using Colormunki.
This home grown profile "grew"out of discussions within this forum in trying to profile Canson Watercolour Paper (thread in this forum)
I have used both Canon and Epson consumer printers. I have a 9000 Pro? I have used OEM K3 ink and on and on......
I am yet again astounded at the way the 3880 and Cone K3 ink makes images, they almost cause me to enter exhibitions, the use by date of these inks passed a year ago, and many argue that OEM Epson K3 is superior.
I could not disagree more, for my style (Matte papers), process and seat of the ' pants ' approach the Cone ink is rendering results on Canson paper as good as I have seen anywhere. And the bonus is I can make the SAME look on 38c per sheet plain paper.
I offer this observation with no intent to detract from the quality of other 3rd party inks, or other brands of printer,
at most what I am saying is that after three plus years of dismal failures and frustratingly bad results bringing there two products together has, for me, put me in a place I had only ever hoped to achieve.
Cheers,
Andrew
Yesterday I started the process of framing the image myself. The task was completed, checked and finished






I have had to start over, reprint, and cut another matt board.
this thread is about that "new" print:
In the last month or more I have printed just two test prints, nothing else.
An external storage device and Lightroom had a tiff
Located a backup .tiff image and sent it to LR guessed that I had used Canson BFK, guesstimated the processing settings, winged the Printer settings and hit PRINT.
I also made a second print slightly more saturated just in case AND a third print on my XeroxiGen3 plain paper. I used Canson ICC profile for the Serious prints and a home grown profile made using Colormunki.
This home grown profile "grew"out of discussions within this forum in trying to profile Canson Watercolour Paper (thread in this forum)
I have used both Canon and Epson consumer printers. I have a 9000 Pro? I have used OEM K3 ink and on and on......
I am yet again astounded at the way the 3880 and Cone K3 ink makes images, they almost cause me to enter exhibitions, the use by date of these inks passed a year ago, and many argue that OEM Epson K3 is superior.
I could not disagree more, for my style (Matte papers), process and seat of the ' pants ' approach the Cone ink is rendering results on Canson paper as good as I have seen anywhere. And the bonus is I can make the SAME look on 38c per sheet plain paper.
I offer this observation with no intent to detract from the quality of other 3rd party inks, or other brands of printer,
at most what I am saying is that after three plus years of dismal failures and frustratingly bad results bringing there two products together has, for me, put me in a place I had only ever hoped to achieve.
Cheers,
Andrew