Search results

Thanks for the feedback. I'll be working on new measurements.

Okay, i just read Claude's report. He has mostly good news but I'm going to have to be led through by the hand to understand exactly what happened to avoid it happening again. Claude's explanation does not jive with the workflow I've seen. I went back & tried to build another profile from some...

Well, I would call it unusable, similar to the other failures. The odd thing is, they are either very good or very bad. I've been looking at the profiles I've made with the LittleArgyllGUI and none of them are as good as the two successful ones with ChromIQ. I can send the ColorMunki files if...

Hi again, Attached are files you requested, one very successful, one not. I ran the Xrite diagnostic on my I1Pro and it passed. I also made a profile with my ColorMunki and it was not successful either. So far I've made two very good and five pretty bad ones. If we had a user here in the States...

Hi All, I'm still having trouble getting good results. So I have my path set right? Attachments are screen shots of my preferences page.

Thanks, pharmacist. I'm going to play with the function that allows you to reread just a problematic line. That is a great feature.

Yep. Attached.

I redid the profile on the Red River greeting cards. I did not use a preset this time but 4 black, 4 white, 32 grey and 468 total patches. The Quality Assessment and the profile are attached. I'll be learning soon how to reread individual patches and improve this profile.

They are 4.5 x 5.5 when folded so the blank sheet is 5.5 x 9. 468 patches fit on two sheets. I'm redoing the profile using 4 white, 4 black & 32 grey patches. I just printed the targets, will read them tomorrow and report back.

I like that. I'll be making a new profile tonight so I'll try it.

Thanks to Itsab1989 and Pharmacist for the quick replies and I will answer both of them here. My questions about bidirectional reading and handling the AdobeRGB1998 profile are answered. Thanks. More info about the problematic 500 patch profile. I use Windows and it was not double profiled. I...

Hello All, I’ve been making profiles with an I1Pro and ArgyllCMS for several years using the LittleArgyllGUI. ChromIQ is much more capable so I expect to be using it now. I don’t mean to imply that I know much about color management though. I’ve read this entire thread and made two profiles...

I've been refilling my Pro 1000 with Precision Colors ink for 8 years with great results. I also have refill carts for my Epson 3880 & 9880 which I fill with OEM Epson K3 ink. They keep chugging along.

Hello again All, I hate being the problem child but after making several profiles successfully I cannot get Argyll to make the profile. The entire process looks normal with the creation of the T1, T2 , & T3 files, they appear to read normally, and the colprof seems to run normally but It makes...

Gentlemen, you have been MORE than helpful. Making these profiles with Argyll has a pretty steep learning curve and you are both helping me get to the next level. Thanks again!!

Here is a completely new profile from the 9880 on Epson semimatte. I used all of the suggested techniques for scanning the targets.

I've attached another profile on the semimatte paper. We can at leasat see if the paper is the problem. Thanks again.

I'm paddling hard to keep up with you gentlemen so I'll have to ask: Is this problematic reflected light coming from the devise or is it ambient light?

I will rescan the semimatte targets. All of this discussion is good for me, gentlemen, as I have much to learn about making printer profiles. I want to learn to read them myself. One thing at a time though. Thanks again for the input.

Yes these are 924 patch targets. I will try your 875 target soon. I use Epson K3 ink except in the 3880 I have Cone carbon black in the matte black channel. But that is not a factor in either of these as they are both done with PK. Thanks again, Pharmacist! I'll be doing more of these next week.