No fair! Those are real pictures!
I think we've discussed those demented judges before. :)
EDIT Jan 9: Oh, too bad. Those pictures just went poof! They were great pictures, even if against the rules.
Guess they're scared off by the awesomeness of my photos.
Come on, guys, they're not that good. You guys have posted some great photos in other threads. :)
Bump
I can't remember if I commented before, but I have a surprising reaction when I look at this picture now. It's too perfect. The one remaining shrub is a little disturbing, and the absence of the others is even more disturbing. It's just too perfect, as if nature is too barren and abstract and...
Well, it's one thing if the printer is broken, but it's quite another to require them to pay people whose printer works fine. I think we need penalties for lawyers who pull that kind of stunt, and they should fire judges who agree to it. That is, assuming I understand the settlement correctly.
Right. If you include the massive amounts of free paper, I paid probably $50 for the printer, and now they have to pay me $50 or $75 credit, and I get to keep the printer. I'm perfectly willing to take advantage of Canon if they enter into it voluntarily, but this is kind of unfair...
OK, guys, you need to get it together. I didn't do that by sitting at home on the couch. I actually had to get up out of the chair and walk over to the window. :)
Is the picture of the week supposed to be taken the same week? If not, well, here is a recent picture of a little birdy I'm fond of. This little goldfinch is moulting.
Click on these to see the full-sized image.
I think some of them are genuinely excellent and well made. I like contrasty photos generally, although some of them fall into the category of high contrast just because we can, and not because it improves the picture. HDR is great if it quietly serves a purpose without drawing attention to...