Recent content by crenedecotret

@buxiaozizai.com Looking at some documentation you may be right. That's bizarre. I ended up with the 0-1 file because printtarg wouldn't accept the ti1 from my first version which was like yours. When I compared with some existing ti1 files I had, I changed the scale. Have to tried to read...

Hi.. this is totally normal for argyllcms. The original script works correctly. You can use r g b values, convert them to TI1 with my script. If you then use printtarg, the tiff files will have the correctt r g b values if you open the in argyllcms

Let me know how it goes with the refillables please. I have a boxed ip8720 that I will eventually open up when i'm done using the ink I have for my very troublesome epson r2000

My apologies for the late reply. I was out for a vacation and it got a little hectic at work when I got back :) Here is the ArgyllCMS version of the chart. Letter sized. It's "as is". I didn't add any additional patches to this one so it will not completely fill the 2nd page.

You may want to checkout inkowl / inkpot, located in Canada

Hello just out of curiosity, would anyone have a printable "ruler" for scanning of small patches with a colormunki and argyllcms that they would be willing to share? I believe I've seen something here for A4 but I'm having problems finding it.. and I'm using letter paper. I typically use a...

Here is the TC918 plus grays TI1. If anyone is curious, my first experiment with the TC9.18 target was a failure. Chartread could not read back even the first line on my color munki. Pretty much every line was being confused with row "K" for some off reason. This was printed with -ii1...

This last patch I think completes the series. I kept the Spyderprint gray patches but instead of using the 225 patchs from the color spyder chart, I let ArgyllCMS 644 patches patches including some grays. With an enlarged i1 size patch, it can still be scanned in with a Colormunki using a...

The TC9.18 is a bit old but i'm curious to see if it will give good or similar results compared to just letting Argyllcms determine the patches. I noticed that the TC918 doesn't seem to include much in the way of neutral. At least not at a quick glance. I built another three page target...

Thanks! I fixed it and changed the attachment in my Spyder 225+grays post

Bonjour Cyr, Il faudra que tu utilise un outil qui permet de réinitialiser le compteur. Generalement il faut payer. Fais une recherche Google pour "WIC Reset L3251". Évidement, le tampon physique n'a pas été remplacé.... eventuellement l'imprimante débordera.... Sorry everyone, I figured...

And finally for those that do not care about paper, Bill Atkinson's 4096 patch target. This is 10 letter pages at i1 size. The 10th page was only partially full so to fill it, I added the Spyderprint extra grays and an extra 15 random patches. I don't see myself ever using this one... ever...

Here is Bill Atkinson's 1728 patch target plus a few gray patches to fill the page. This is 4 letter sized sheets with slightly enlarged i1 patches

Here is the TC9.18 target. It's scaled at 306 patches per page which should work OK for a Colormunki. I randomized the chart. I suspect this one won't be any better than a normal ArgyllCMS profile with or without preconditioning but hey.. this is for science

Thanks... Here are two versions of the High Quality Target plus Grays for Argyllcms. The first version includes the color and gray charts patches in order. I had to modify the scale a tiny bit because the gray target has more patches than the color target. The color portion ends up looking...