- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 5,862
- Reaction score
- 6,985
- Points
- 363
- Location
- Germany
- Printer Model
- L805, WF2010, ET8550
Aardenburg starts testing the Epson SC-P400 and the Canon Pro-1000
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/canon-imageprograf-pro-1000-now-test/
and publishes some more results about the Epson P600 HD inks
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/e...mlux-hr-lightfade-test-results-now-available/
It's all pretty long term tests with these pigment inks , but they show some interesting differences. I have not seen yet any test of claimed compatible 3rd party inks for the P600/800 to compare with. It's about the mostly unanswered question how much - or much less - performance do I get when using non-OEM inks at a lower price point.
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/canon-imageprograf-pro-1000-now-test/
and publishes some more results about the Epson P600 HD inks
http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/e...mlux-hr-lightfade-test-results-now-available/
It's all pretty long term tests with these pigment inks , but they show some interesting differences. I have not seen yet any test of claimed compatible 3rd party inks for the P600/800 to compare with. It's about the mostly unanswered question how much - or much less - performance do I get when using non-OEM inks at a lower price point.
