Search results

  1. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    Thanks for pointing this out, I will correct it. But it’s the pp201 with pro 10 for sure.
  2. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    I don't know if there is much more changes between the PP201 and the PT101 with the ET8550. The Original ICCs for the canon pro 10, there is a very small difference between PP201 and PT101. The PT101 paper has a bigger gamut
  3. marco565

    A basic guide (see post #1) to setting up ARGYLL CMS profiling on your computer

    It works with 812, you need colored separators, crop a bit the image to have perfect use of the paper, and move rather slow. But that does not give you more benefit than the 600 patch target which is much easier to scan(like 5min vs 15min), even the 483 is very good compared to OEM profiles...
  4. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    They are in the zip file in the "canon pp201.zip"
  5. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    here it is
  6. marco565

    A basic guide (see post #1) to setting up ARGYLL CMS profiling on your computer

    I did another test today, comparing my standard 483 patches vs 812 patches with some profiles as reference: 483 Command: targen -v -d2 -G -e6 -B5 -g128 -f483 "test" 812 Command: targen -v -d2 -G -e6 -B5 -g64 -s16 -f812 -c SOME_GLOSSY_PROFILE_FROM_MY_PRINTER "test Both tests were tested on the...
  7. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    New test result: Canon Glossy Plus II (PP201) paper So I have to say first that the Profiles that I get from the Color Munki with 483 patches (812 patches don't change much on a different paper) are a perfect match to the Canon Profiles. Really appreciate that! It is not like profiles from the...
  8. marco565

    A basic guide (see post #1) to setting up ARGYLL CMS profiling on your computer

    Did you use "spotread.exe" to mensurate the values of the patches? I would say mesures are within margin error... 0.55mm aperture is quite small! but it looks like there is not too much impact. I tried an 812 patch vs the CAP480 (addressed in this thread). I see a very tiny improvement of the...
  9. marco565

    Reviving a Canon pro 10

    That makes sense, thanks for the explanation :) What about the longevity of the 106 inks compared to the 114?
  10. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    On this test image that I choose for the diversity of pictures we see that the et8550 has more saturation however on the Tuscany picture we see that the pro 10 does a bit better in the sky probably thanks to PM and PC inks. The darks to be honest look more or less the same. Except the guy with...
  11. marco565

    Reviving a Canon pro 10

    The price increased ! I paid 750e for it. To be honest, I will not refill the ET8550, 70ml of ink cost 16e I have other things to do than save 5e per bottle and having much worst quality inks. ATM I am having an internal thought about what I am doing with 2 printers since the ET8550 from the...
  12. marco565

    Reviving a Canon pro 10

    that's very interesting that Dye inks from Epson do not work on canon printer. Too bad I think this would have been a great combo
  13. marco565

    A basic guide (see post #1) to setting up ARGYLL CMS profiling on your computer

    Yes, I always use a white sheet of paper that does not have OBAs under my targets, but the sheet is the same on the measurements with or without a ruler. To be honest, I think this is just data to consider. The profiles look perfect so I would not bother too much with this. I just wanted to...
  14. marco565

    Reviving a Canon pro 10

    that's not surprising ^^ Precision Color even modified it to run with Pigment ink (I don't know how reliable this is). But jokes a part, I think that a pro 100 refilled with ET8550 inks + G550 red ink + Custom PM and PC made with distilled water of the ET8550 inks will be probably a very cheap...
  15. marco565

    Reviving a Canon pro 10

    Buy an ET8550 ;)
  16. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    here they are :) If you are interested in all the profiles that I have made so far, here they are: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wP3-n6oiAvZkRS8N7_HppaTNXN36b-eq?usp=sharing
  17. marco565

    Reviving a Canon pro 10

    Why no go with Lucia pro? Thats the inks that are in the pro 300. So basically you make the pro 10 = pro300 since they have the same head (maybe software is different).
  18. marco565

    Canon Pro 10 vs Epson ET8550

    After buying a color Munky and doing with ICC profiles with ArgyIICMS, I am now in a new good base to start comparing the printer. My next test was the Fotospeed Platinium Etching, however from what I have tested this applies to other Fotospeed mate papers + canon pro premium mate and Epson...
  19. marco565

    A basic guide (see post #1) to setting up ARGYLL CMS profiling on your computer

    The size of a thin mate paper is added I guess is 0.15mm not sure that is what makes the difference. In my opinion is more due tu the refection of the light in the guide (even if it’s black) that might somehow have an impact. The case of the CM adds at least 0.7cm to the size of the device and...
  20. marco565

    A basic guide (see post #1) to setting up ARGYLL CMS profiling on your computer

    Hi, Guys I wanted to share a discovery that I made recently, while trying out my new guide I discovered this: On a very BIG pink patch (applies to white also, so far I have tested 2): Without ruler: Result is XYZ: 60.946693 42.311576 46.983188, D50 Lab: 71.085207 53.738058 -15.637152 ISO Vis...
Top