Canon 7D Mk II

Well thats not too bad! can still connect by cable camera - printer on the coffee table
I would have thought it would have been a lot cheaper to get the partner to draw you a map of the house rather than all the expense of a 7DII + GPS, that you hardly ever get out and use

It is interesting to see you are at 352 metres altitude when you get to the top of the hill if nothing else!

Emulator said:

Interesting that you roo-d the day you got the Pro 1.

Click to expand...

Too true but I’d have felt the same if I had gotten the Pro 10, it has as many restrictions and tricks as the Pro 1 does, and I now only used occasionally, in fact it’s become a white elephant..

The Hat said:

Too true but I’d have felt the same if I had gotten the Pro 10, it has as many restrictions and tricks as the Pro 1 does, and I now only used occasionally, in fact it’s become a white elephant..

Click to expand...

That's so damn sad when it happens too, its not funny, a person feels diddled. I get the same way with my Apple Laptop it really gets me going when I am confined by what some Marketer want to constrain my adventures to.

Speaking of GPS and how high one is above sea level. ! !

Just for pig iron sake, my son tried it from home using Google Maps then his Phone and then the Sat-Nav and each one gave a different figure which bother me because none of them could agree and had a 15 metres difference.

So I decided to do it my way and over many Sunday mornings and a 4-30 start I began at my front gate and got level readings all the way down to the beach, (2 hours after high tide) some 5Km away by road, 2Km by crow.

The measurements I got were 54.7 Metres and the closes that these electronic devices got to my figure was with-in 3 metres, so a spirit level and a large plank may not be High-Tech equipment anymore but it give me an accuracy to with-in 50cm I reckon.

So you may be able to get Sat-Nav reading from you couch, but is it a bird, is it a plane or is it a Tidal Wave, and you better hope the darn couch can float..

As I said, it doesn't work indoors.

The major difference between the Epson 3880 pigment (from RogerB's image) and the Canon 9000 II dye can be seen on these Gamutvision displays of the profile gamuts against the AdobeRGB 1998 colour space outer net.
Unfortunately with different paper type, but it illustrates the Canon volume at 798012 and the Epson 894504 against the AdobeRGB at 1225088.

A real Houdini.

Your colours are really crisp, is that an outcome of using Argylle do you think?