Fading away or is it..

Smile

Printer Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
417
Points
253
Location
Europe EU
Printer Model
Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
The ultimate UV protection is from Car paint UV coat laquer, available in matt or gloss by many brands I read. I wonder if you tested this?
 

The Hat

Printer VIP
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
15,618
Reaction score
8,691
Points
453
Location
Residing in Wicklow Ireland
Printer Model
Canon/3D, CR-10, CR-10S, KP-3
When it comes down to it the Elephant in the room has all the answers, no not his big trunk, but switch to a pigment ink printer, problem solved.. :)
 

stratman

Printer VIP
Platinum Printer Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
8,712
Reaction score
7,163
Points
393
Location
USA
Printer Model
Canon MB5120, Pencil
When it comes down to it the Elephant in the room has all the answers, no not his big trunk, but switch to a pigment ink printer, problem solved.. :)
elephant1.gif
Yes, but, are you looking for perfection or close enough? :idunno
 

Paul Verizzo

Print Addict
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
424
Reaction score
88
Points
173
Location
Sarasota, FL, USA
Printer Model
Canon ip4500, 9000 MK II, PRO-
When it comes down to it the Elephant in the room has all the answers, no not his big trunk, but switch to a pigment ink printer, problem solved.. :)
We all know the many reasons not to go pigment, Senor Sombrero.

One that I find interesting and never mentioned is that matte finish photo papers, I'm talking silver halide, never had much following. Primarily because of the low Dmax. Ditto for inkjet papers until pigment printers came along. Because they are the safe papers for pigment printing, of course. Suddenly the world is awash in matte papers because of pigment inks.

The bottom line is that except for the longer life span, there are only negatives with pigment printers. And I ain't speaking the ones that make positives.
 
Last edited:

Paul Verizzo

Print Addict
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
424
Reaction score
88
Points
173
Location
Sarasota, FL, USA
Printer Model
Canon ip4500, 9000 MK II, PRO-
Thanks Paul, very useful and timely advice.

I have been producing a few gallery wraps over the last year of so, and have have been concerned about the lack of surface protection.

Investigating available coatings is a veritable minefield for the uninitiated. Also complicated by shipping restrictions in some cases.

Your summary is very informative and gives an excellent base for my renewed search.

RS
Happy to help (and/or learn from!) incorrigible investigators and experimenters like us.

I think the one easiest post-printing protection is to dehydrate the print with modest heat or a dessication chamber, first. This may not be of concern in some dry locations, but certainly should be done with fat paper, especially w/o polyethylene backing in humid climes. Then spray front, back and edges with inexpensive hardware store clear lacquer. Available in gloss, semi-gloss, and matte. You have at least stopped moisture and gas degradation pretty easily.

Some of my tests indicate that it is a combination of UV, moisture, and gas that kill the prints faster than any of them alone. Negative synergy. I can't state it as fact at this time, more time and tests will tell.

As a tease example of four that I could offer, I took a square of kitchen food wrap. Since 2004, these have been low density polyethylene, LDPE. (The original plastic used was a far better barrier for both air and water.) I took some Permatex All Purpose Spray adhesive, sprayer the print, rolled the film onto it. Don't even ask why I did this! Two weeks in the Florida sun and it remains subjectively perfect! No UV shielding at all. As good as the square with the physical UV blocking Print Shields taped to the paper. Meanwhile, the naked and the UV sprays deteriorate.
 

Paul Verizzo

Print Addict
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
424
Reaction score
88
Points
173
Location
Sarasota, FL, USA
Printer Model
Canon ip4500, 9000 MK II, PRO-
The ultimate UV protection is from Car paint UV coat laquer, available in matt or gloss by many brands I read. I wonder if you tested this?

Not I, but no need to go there. First, I can't! I think a quart of single part car paints are hitting $50. Haven't bought any in about seven years, yes, I've done car painting. Not sure about the UV spec you mention, it could be marketing, it could be great - not sure what it's protecting - it could be ineffective like the alleged UV sprays I've tried. In fact, as I think about it and w/o researching, it probably means the clear coat itself is resistant to UV degradaion. That makes sense. A lot of cars, like my 1989 Jeep, from the early days of two coat paints suffered from what I called "Hood Mange." Flaking of the clear coat.

Clear coats do two things. They give a great gloss to the matte undercoat, and they protect that from oxidation.
 

Smile

Printer Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
417
Points
253
Location
Europe EU
Printer Model
Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
Well from car paints I tried (the ones that are basic solvent based) need to be coated to not flake off the car from sun. So the clear coat need to protect the paint from flaking off and changing color (fading).

Where I live they can mix you as minimum as 100grams, 1liter cost is about 17Eur for paint, acrylic paints are about 12Eur a liter.
This clear coat is 7Eur 0.6liter 2component epoxy https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-cl=84503534&v=wuklMOLBK5Q&x-yt-ts=1421914688
 
Last edited:

Paul Verizzo

Print Addict
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
424
Reaction score
88
Points
173
Location
Sarasota, FL, USA
Printer Model
Canon ip4500, 9000 MK II, PRO-
@Smile: That's what I said.

And I sure as heck am not experimenting with two part epoxy paints on prints! If that paint has UV in it's description, it surely means it won't yellow with UV as I speculated. That's what happens with epoxy paints in the sun light.
 

Smile

Printer Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
417
Points
253
Location
Europe EU
Printer Model
Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
Here is a scientific test idea for you, take a sheet glass of quartz that passes all UV rays. Then coat it with spray under test. Measure the UV rays (wit spectrophotometer or UV tester) from the sun or controlled UV source like high pressure sodium lamps with removed filter glass.

HID_PHOTO60%20a32636b1-a7db-4b56-a324-22c6524325ca.jpg


Draw conclusions if certain UV sprays work or not, how good or bad they block the UV.
 

palombian

Printer Master
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
1,869
Reaction score
2,244
Points
297
Location
Belgium
Printer Model
PRO10,PRO9500II,MB5150,MG8250
We all know the many reasons not to go pigment, Senor Sombrero.

One that I find interesting and never mentioned is that matte finish photo papers, I'm talking silver halide, never had much following. Primarily because of the low Dmax. Ditto for inkjet papers until pigment printers came along. Because they are the safe papers for pigment printing, of course. Suddenly the world is awash in matte papers because of pigment inks.

The bottom line is that except for the longer life span, there are only negatives with pigment printers. And I ain't speaking the ones that make positives.


From my short (well, soon 1 year :)) stay in the fabulous inkjet printer world, it seems to me that both pigment and dye technologies have improved a lot and that the historical advantages and disadvantages are ruminated endlessly.

But I take the risk to get the flak by recommending a recent - but still refillable - dye printer as a start for most photo amateurs.
 

Latest posts

Top